2nd Amendment

Years ago our for fathers created the Constitution. This is nothing new and has been around for decades. This was created under a REPUBLIC, not a democracy. The 2nd amendment was placed at the top of the list for good reason. To protect against tyranny. The people of the United States, under GOD, shall bear arms so that the elected Government not hold greater power than the people.

I could go on to indicate that the states that have allowed gun free zones to be implemented carry a higher death rate by guns than those states that have open carry laws. What States you might ask, Maine vs Illinois for example if you want to research it.

Thousands of Law abiding citizens each year take to the woods with guns in hand to hunt. Yet this is done without one human death, minus the occasional accident. So there are hundreds of thousands of guns being used each year without issue. Any law that would go in place would only hurt those law abiding citizens. So at the end of the day you have to ask are the Democrats ignorant or ....... (intentional pause)...... just up to something?  I would think many followers to be simply ignorant and following the close masses. But the top tier Democrats either by accepting monies for vision or just plain out to take control.

Life is a gift from GOD and if We the people allow this Nation, under GOD, to be taken away, I am afraid We will have no one to blame but ourselves. Allowing any of our rights to be taken away is not the right path for any reason. If We allow them to take our guns then what is next? Pretty soon We are left with nothing but debt and disappointment.

And the way We are continually being taxed to death along with inflation it is inevitable that there will be another revolution in this country unless things start to change.

What can We do to keep this from happening. The answer is simple. VOTE!

We need to vote people in that understand how to work with in a budget and get rid of programs that shouldn't be paid for by tax payers. People that want to do what they are elected to do. Up hold the Constitution and not spend their days in office thinking of ways to change it on our dime.

Obama removes Congress by Executive Order

 Would not have believed it but after reading about this in an article written by Andy Borowitz of the New Yorker today, it must be true. Obama has set his sites on either staying in office or causing as much damage as possible before he leaves.

How does this create more jobs? 
How does this help the economy and stability in our country?
Are all the rednecks out there that said he was the next Hitler getting that much closer to being able to say, I told you so?

Where is he headed with this move? Now that all the elected officials that are to represent "The People" are gone, who is representing US? If this isn't the first step in a dictatorship I am not sure what is. And I am astonished that I haven't seen anything on the news channels yet.  Only time will tell if this is a stunt by the comedian to write such an article or if it is real.

Source: http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/obama-signs-executive-order-closing-congress

Cyber Hygiene, the next US excuse to take away more civil rights?

In the latest news around CNN and the US Obama Administration is all about Cyber Hygiene. The Obama Administration is voicing their opinion to look deep into securing not only the US Governments cyber abilities but those of the Citizens. They are using the excuses of the Sony Hack, which any true Hacker can tell you could not have been carried out unless someone from the inside was involved. And with all the celeb pics and twitter accounts being hacked, well what better excuse to work around their agenda and pass some superficial legislature.

Remember the Patriot Act and all the privacy the US Citizens lost. This is the US Government at it again. They tried to for Google and several phone companies to open the doors and allow all access to the information they have collected to only run into the Giant Wallet of Google and their ability to tie it up in court. Phone companies creating new phones that not even the phone companies have access to. So what is the Government to do.... Pass some super Cyber Hygiene Act and force all internet connections to flow through their hands first. This will allow them to track you and to change the information you receive.

Not at all good for anyone, and it will be done all with an excuse that the public has no idea how to safe guard there password to a twitter account that might have a nude picture of a celeb somewhere that didn't get paid for the picture..... ALL bullshit reasons to allow the US Government to reach further into your business and see where they can take more from US, be it Liberty, Guns, Money or your Identity. There is no good reason for the US Government to have greater access to my MySpace Page or this Blogger Account than That of the owner(Google) or the Author(Myself).

Just a prediction that my soon become a reality and after they have CONTROL of all internet information in and out of the US, you bet your ASS they will figure a way to TAX it.


Edited 5 mins later:
no sooner than I hit Publish an article, better written, was published and shared and kinda made me do one of them < I told ya so's.....

Here's the link http://news.yahoo.com/patriot-acts-unintended-consequences-post-9-11-world-203913740.html

DEA has found a new use for Dogs

The DEA has been known for using K-9's to sniff out illegal drugs. They have been quite successful with them at their sides in finding well hid stashes. The K-9's have more than done their job in the past but now the DEA may fear the need for them may be dwindling in some cases.

We the People are no longer afraid to speak out on wanting Marijuana Legalized. And with that in would come some law changes that will affect the non violent policies and laws dealing with marijuana. The DEA sees this as an issue because they have squandered some much of our tax money on chasing these non violent offenders that they won't be able to justify their expenses. Ultimately this is sure to decrease the yearly budget and save tax payers money.  With that fear in mind the DEA is working on going another direction, Protect the dogs...

Testifying on the DEA budget during a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on Wednesday, Leonhart said she expected a number of things to happen after Washington and Colorado were allowed to go forward with the legalization of marijuana last year. What she didn't anticipate was the impact on man's best friend.

 I predict some kind of DEA task force to allow them entry into the home to spot test your pets for some kind of marijuana pet abuse. And of course, they will seize your house, cars and bank accounts and spend the money before your court case is heard. After all that is how they get most of there money isn't it? So all you pet lovers and pot smokers beware, the DEA are still looking for ways to come after what is yours instead of focusing on the real DRUG issues like powerhouse companies that still put BHT in your children's' cereal.

Make marijuana Legal, it's a no brainer.

Make marijuana Legal, it's a no brainer. (no pun intended). Why are individual states eager to legalize? Simple, MONEY. They not only have an anticipated growth in increased tax revenue from sales but at the same time have the ability to lower their  expenses for maintaining law enforcement to uphold previously illegal  possession, cultivation and consumption laws.

Thumbs up to the States that embrace what the voters want( to be free to choose for themselves).

 Cannabis remains classified as an illegal narcotic under federal law, though the Obama administration has said it will give individual states leeway to carry out their own recreational-use statutes.

 So why doesn't the Federal government want to go a step further..... Simple, Power(Control). They already have your money and want to continue using it to empower their Agencies with the ability to take what ever you have and write you off as a Drug Dealer. They Spend Billions of dollars of YOUR MONEY brought in by taxes to pay for all the surveillance equipment, guns, helicopters and man power. Not to mention the Tax dollars it takes to house these NON-violent drug offenders in Federal Prisons.   But you won't here about a quick and Huge cut in expenses from the Federal Government simply by allowing the People Some Of Their FREEDOM back..... Makes you wonder just how important their agenda is to them.

The Federal Government Spends Billions to justify taking More from us each year and squanders it frivolously in an attempt to take the rest of what we the people have worked hard for. They want it ALL.

Nearly 20 states, including Colorado and Washington, had already put themselves at odds with the U.S. government by approving marijuana for medical purposes.

At least the states are getting on board and telling the Federal Government to Stick It!

Who Does the U.S.Government Owe? National Debt?

Looking at who the government owes may seem like a huge list, but lets start at the root of it.

We the People Started Paying in a Tax to Social Security and back when it started it was only .5% and if the government had left it alone all this time there would be no need to increase it and there would be enough money to cover those that pay into it. THOSE WHO PAID INTO IT. I think you know where I'm heading with this. The US Government has been spending our hard earned money for years. So I say to you this.... The U.S. Government owes the Social Security Fund More money than any other country it has borrowed from.  So politics aside, the Government needs to quick sending our money out of the country and start putting it back where it belongs. Feed your family before you feed your neighbors!!!

but, but what about all the money we owe China... "What about it" we can still owe it to them after we pay ourselves back. Lets start taking care of our own.

How about a New SPENDING CONTROLl Bill?

I have recently an heard argument from an older female American citizen that is for gun control. Her Argument was that guns don't need magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. When I explained to her that the manufacturer wasn't were you get these magazines, but from aftermarket distributors it was then a well there is no need for assault rifles... Which would take us into the ...well there is no need for candy or gum or porn or movies, etc. Then She went on to say that without governmental gun control that China would just come and take us over. And I thought to myself, Other countries have no interest in invading a country where there are 5 guns to each household. Much easier to invade those countries without guns, besides the fact that China already owns us. We are but a mere retail outlet store for them but that is for an entirely new post.

 As I sat there thinking about the time and effort the Government and or media has put into detracting us with this old issue. The 2nd Amendment is still there to protect the rights of all citizens. Instead we the people should be focusing on a more important issue, Government Spending!

When I run out of money, I stop spending until I get more, not go tax more so I can spend more. Eventually there is no more to take. I am all for sharing when I have excess and my children aren't hungry. But when I haven't enough to feed my own family I sure as hell am not going to steal from my own household to share with my neighbor. Our current Government takes form its own and sends it abroad when it should be taking care of its own. Besides, when did public appointed figures become celebrities with no accountability for their actions?

Google tells FBI to suck it!

“The FBI has the authority to prohibit companies from talking about these requests,” reads a blog post about the new numbers on Google’s public policy blog. “But we’ve been trying to find a way to provide more information about the NSLs we get—particularly as people have voiced concerns about the increase in their use since 9/11. Starting today, we’re now including data about NSLs in our Transparency Report. We’re thankful to U.S. government officials for working with us to provide greater insight into the use of NSLs.”

NSLs have come under fire not just for their secrecy, but for their lack of judicial review; They require far less oversight than a search warrant or even a subpoena, can be issued by any FBI field office, and have been applied much more widely in the post-9/11 era. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has called NSLs “one of the most frightening and invasive…of all the dangerous government surveillance powers that were expanded by the USA PATRIOT Act.”

Google specifies in an FAQ included with its report on NSLs that the letters can only legally seek “the name, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records” of a Google user. Those outmoded legal terms mean that the FBI shouldn’t be able to get actual content data such as Gmail messages or private YouTube videos. Perhaps surprisingly, even IP addresses are off limits, Google says.

 Read Google’s full blog post here.

157 Specific Firearms Ban, Whats the point?

A bill introduced last month by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. would ban 157 specific firearms designed for military and law enforcement use and exempt others made for hunting purposes. It also would ban ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. (Eileen Sullivan)

 "There's no logic to it," said Greg Danas, president of a Massachusetts-based expert witness business and firearms ballistic laboratory. "What kind of effect is it going to have?"

If you ban any specific gun you will achieve :
1) Less jobs for those Americans that are making them
2) Law Enforcement and Government that have more Power(CONTROL) over its law abiding Citizens
3) Raise the price of pre-banned weapons on the black market
4) Give the media something to report on instead of Government OVER Spending
5) Criminals will still commit crimes, killers will still kill and law abiding Citizens will continue to have the Government take away their Constitutional Rights.
6) It would give politicians a chance to say "Lookie at what I did"

Its already illegal to kill people, HELLO!

Why Disarm Law-Abiding Citizens?

Amazingly enough our Government has finally gotten around to realizing the it is already spent wasted time on this issue. So they are trying to fix gun violence with deeper background checks on law-abiding citizens. Criminals are already getting their hands on guns without this effort. And in some cases they are getting the guns from the so called "Government Sting Operations".

More laws do not keep law breakers from committing crime. Even a 6 year old knows that, yet our government still pursues this course. The greatest question should be WHY? The only feasible answer is purely CONTROL. They will never have control over law breakers, but they can use these opportunities to take greater control over the ones that do abide by the law.  IF WE LET THEM.

I agree it is a tough idea to stand up to a government that just walks in and takes over Countries but it has to start somewhere. Without our Constitutional Rights this Country is no longer FREE and will need to be liberated by the Dictators in office. We can only hope that when it comes down to it that our own military soldiers Stand firm when it comes to defending Constitutional Rights.

I do not believe it is right for any law abiding citizen to work hard and save money to buy a gun legally only to have it taken away from a government that only seeks to disarm its people.

Does Obama Administration want to disarm the people only to make it easier for this country to be invaded by another Country?  Only they know the answer to that one. With higher Taxes and more Gun Control the people will no longer have anything left to defend the untapped oil supplies of this country. I guess the Obama Administration is holding off drilling so that whom ever invades our country will have a reason to do so after they make it nice an easy on them by disarming the Nations Second Largest Army.... its Armed Citizens.

Bill Gates recently gave a Commencement speech at a High School

Bill Gates recently gave a Commencement speech at a High School about 11 things they did not and will not learn in school. He talks about how feel-good, politic...ally correct teachings created a generation of kids with no concept of reality and how this concept set them up for failure in the real world.

Rule 1: Life is not fair - get used to it!

Rule 2: The world won't care about your self-esteem. The world will expect you to accomplish something BEFORE you feel good about yourself.

Rule 3: You will NOT make $60,000 a year right out of high school. You won't be a vice-president with a car phone until you earn both.

Rule 4: If you think your teacher is tough, wait till you get a boss.

Rule 5: Flipping burgers is not beneath your dignity. Your Grandparents had a different word for burger flipping: they called it opportunity.

Rule 6: If you mess up, it's not your parents' fault, so don't whine about your mistakes; learn from them.

Rule 7: Before you were born, your parents weren't as boring as they are now. They got that way from paying your bills, cleaning your clothes and listening to you talk about how cool you thought you were. So before you save the rain forest from the parasites of your parent's generation, try delousing the closet in your own room.

Rule 8: Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life HAS NOT. In some schools, they have abolished failing grades and they'll give you as MANY TIMES as you want to get the right answer. This doesn't bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in real life.

Rule 9: Life is not divided into semesters. You don't get summers off and very few employers are interested in helping you FIND YOURSELF. Do that on your own time.

Rule 10: Television is NOT real life. In real life people actually have to leave the coffee shop and go to jobs.

Rule 11: Be nice to nerds. Chances are you'll end up working for one.

If you agree, pass it on.
If you can read this - Thank a teacher!
If you are reading it in English - Thank a soldier!!

President Barack Obama urges tighter federal gun laws

Um, Isn't already illegal to kill someone?

So does this mean he wants to take guns away from the feds? or does it mean he is finally going to stop allowing guns to be imported to help save American jobs?  yep, you guessed it. He is supporting killing more American jobs as usual and leave guns in the hands of government employees.....

Gun Control Laws

Seriously, Its already illegal to kill someone. So if your worried about that, all we need is stiffer punishment as a deterrent. Guns don't kill people, Criminals do.  So why would the Government be so pushy when it comes to gun control? Simple, the only thing that stands between them and complete control of US is our ability to rise up once more. Take all the guns away from law abiding citizens and the only ones left with guns are the criminals. When if comes to having the freedom to own a gun, or the lack of freedom of not owning one. I Choose FREEDOM!

Republican or Democrat makes no difference

These days its the usual "Taste great, Less filling" when it comes to politics. The Government has us on one side of the bench or the other. This keeps us pointing the finger at each other and away from the real source of the problem.  The government as a whole is the real issue here. No matter who is elected as the official puppet, our Taxes will increase.

One of the biggest things to think about is how the younger generation is influenced. They look at their first pay check and see 33% goes to taxes not realizing that less than 100 years ago there was no tax and before their own children begin to work they will be paying much, much more in one way or another. If you take all the taxes on everything you do, you are already paying out more than 50% in taxes. Until these new workers have paid taxes for about 10 years, they tend to not realize just how much they are giving to the government to decide what to do with there own money.

Maybe its time we should take a look from an outside perspective? Capitalism and Freedom might be what we think we still have.  Let me leave you with this.

People today think they are free as long as they can still choose the color of car they drive to work.....

Obama vs. Romney

We all have are opinion of who should be the next President of the United States of America. So lets set those aside and think for a moment about what major concerns we should be thinking about when it comes to an election. Does my vote really count?  In the last election there was proof that Votes for Obama were indeed fabricated electronically but no re-vote?  Even if the majority of people vote for one side or the other they can still loose.... Should the president elect really need to line up a legal team to dispute the election?   Hold onto your seats cause this one is gonna get sticky.

Prediction. Romney wins. Obama challenges.

Under the U.S. tax code the non-profit arm of American Crossroads, known as Crossroads GPS, can raise and spend unlimited funds as a "social welfare" organization without disclosing its donors, as long as it advocates for positions on issues and does not directly support a candidate.

So this means the campaign money can come from any country or any person.  Meaning any one in the world with a pocket full of cash can influence our entire Nation. Just a more civil form of "King of the Jungle" I suppose.

Saturn Ion under U.S. safety review for steering flaw

WASHINGTON (Bloomberg) -- General Motors Co.'s Saturn Ion is being investigated by U.S. auto-safety regulators following at least 633 complaints about sudden loss of power steering.

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is investigating about 384,000 Ions from model years 2004 to 2007, after reports of crashes involving injuries, the agency said today on its website.

The agency said it received four reports of crashes involving the defect, one of which resulted in an injury. GM has received seven reports of crashes, involving two injuries, according to the agency, which cited possible overlap between the numbers reported by the regulator and the manufacturer.

GM discontinued the Saturn brand after filing for bankruptcy last year.

“Customers who have those vehicles have been notified,” said Alan Adler, a spokesman for GM. “And if they have loss of power-steering assist, they can go to dealers and have that repaired.”

NHTSA spokeswoman Karen Aldana declined to comment beyond the agency's statement posted on its website.

GM pays U.S. Treasury $2.1 billion for preferred shares

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- General Motors Co. has completed the buyback of the government's holdings of GM preferred stock issued in the automaker's bailout for $2.1 billion, the U.S. Treasury Department said today.
The repurchase brings GM's total repayments to U.S. taxpayers to $23.1 billion, including $13.5 billion received from the automaker's initial public offering last month, the Treasury

Bill Clinton the Puppets Hand?

Bill Clinton tosses Obama aside and runs the show himself. Obama introduced Clinton lightly as "the other guy" and recalled how Clinton has overseen heady economic times. Obama warned that he wouldn't be staying long — another White House Christmas party was waiting, as was his wife, Michelle.

I guess the Party was more important to Obama than the public's economy.

Obama doesn't deliver on his promise.

The deal Obama crafted with Senate Republican leaders would prevent the scheduled Dec. 31 expiration of all the Bush administration's tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003, even though Obama had often promised to end the cuts for the highest earners.