How about a New SPENDING CONTROLl Bill?

I have recently an heard argument from an older female American citizen that is for gun control. Her Argument was that guns don't need magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. When I explained to her that the manufacturer wasn't were you get these magazines, but from aftermarket distributors it was then a well there is no need for assault rifles... Which would take us into the ...well there is no need for candy or gum or porn or movies, etc. Then She went on to say that without governmental gun control that China would just come and take us over. And I thought to myself, Other countries have no interest in invading a country where there are 5 guns to each household. Much easier to invade those countries without guns, besides the fact that China already owns us. We are but a mere retail outlet store for them but that is for an entirely new post.

 As I sat there thinking about the time and effort the Government and or media has put into detracting us with this old issue. The 2nd Amendment is still there to protect the rights of all citizens. Instead we the people should be focusing on a more important issue, Government Spending!

When I run out of money, I stop spending until I get more, not go tax more so I can spend more. Eventually there is no more to take. I am all for sharing when I have excess and my children aren't hungry. But when I haven't enough to feed my own family I sure as hell am not going to steal from my own household to share with my neighbor. Our current Government takes form its own and sends it abroad when it should be taking care of its own. Besides, when did public appointed figures become celebrities with no accountability for their actions?

Google tells FBI to suck it!

“The FBI has the authority to prohibit companies from talking about these requests,” reads a blog post about the new numbers on Google’s public policy blog. “But we’ve been trying to find a way to provide more information about the NSLs we get—particularly as people have voiced concerns about the increase in their use since 9/11. Starting today, we’re now including data about NSLs in our Transparency Report. We’re thankful to U.S. government officials for working with us to provide greater insight into the use of NSLs.”

NSLs have come under fire not just for their secrecy, but for their lack of judicial review; They require far less oversight than a search warrant or even a subpoena, can be issued by any FBI field office, and have been applied much more widely in the post-9/11 era. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has called NSLs “one of the most frightening and invasive…of all the dangerous government surveillance powers that were expanded by the USA PATRIOT Act.”

Google specifies in an FAQ included with its report on NSLs that the letters can only legally seek “the name, address, length of service, and local and long distance toll billing records” of a Google user. Those outmoded legal terms mean that the FBI shouldn’t be able to get actual content data such as Gmail messages or private YouTube videos. Perhaps surprisingly, even IP addresses are off limits, Google says.

 Read Google’s full blog post here.

157 Specific Firearms Ban, Whats the point?

A bill introduced last month by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. would ban 157 specific firearms designed for military and law enforcement use and exempt others made for hunting purposes. It also would ban ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. (Eileen Sullivan)

 "There's no logic to it," said Greg Danas, president of a Massachusetts-based expert witness business and firearms ballistic laboratory. "What kind of effect is it going to have?"

If you ban any specific gun you will achieve :
1) Less jobs for those Americans that are making them
2) Law Enforcement and Government that have more Power(CONTROL) over its law abiding Citizens
3) Raise the price of pre-banned weapons on the black market
4) Give the media something to report on instead of Government OVER Spending
5) Criminals will still commit crimes, killers will still kill and law abiding Citizens will continue to have the Government take away their Constitutional Rights.
6) It would give politicians a chance to say "Lookie at what I did"

Its already illegal to kill people, HELLO!

Why Disarm Law-Abiding Citizens?

Amazingly enough our Government has finally gotten around to realizing the it is already spent wasted time on this issue. So they are trying to fix gun violence with deeper background checks on law-abiding citizens. Criminals are already getting their hands on guns without this effort. And in some cases they are getting the guns from the so called "Government Sting Operations".

More laws do not keep law breakers from committing crime. Even a 6 year old knows that, yet our government still pursues this course. The greatest question should be WHY? The only feasible answer is purely CONTROL. They will never have control over law breakers, but they can use these opportunities to take greater control over the ones that do abide by the law.  IF WE LET THEM.

I agree it is a tough idea to stand up to a government that just walks in and takes over Countries but it has to start somewhere. Without our Constitutional Rights this Country is no longer FREE and will need to be liberated by the Dictators in office. We can only hope that when it comes down to it that our own military soldiers Stand firm when it comes to defending Constitutional Rights.

I do not believe it is right for any law abiding citizen to work hard and save money to buy a gun legally only to have it taken away from a government that only seeks to disarm its people.

Does Obama Administration want to disarm the people only to make it easier for this country to be invaded by another Country?  Only they know the answer to that one. With higher Taxes and more Gun Control the people will no longer have anything left to defend the untapped oil supplies of this country. I guess the Obama Administration is holding off drilling so that whom ever invades our country will have a reason to do so after they make it nice an easy on them by disarming the Nations Second Largest Army.... its Armed Citizens.

Bill Gates recently gave a Commencement speech at a High School

Bill Gates recently gave a Commencement speech at a High School about 11 things they did not and will not learn in school. He talks about how feel-good, politic...ally correct teachings created a generation of kids with no concept of reality and how this concept set them up for failure in the real world.

Rule 1: Life is not fair - get used to it!

Rule 2: The world won't care about your self-esteem. The world will expect you to accomplish something BEFORE you feel good about yourself.

Rule 3: You will NOT make $60,000 a year right out of high school. You won't be a vice-president with a car phone until you earn both.

Rule 4: If you think your teacher is tough, wait till you get a boss.

Rule 5: Flipping burgers is not beneath your dignity. Your Grandparents had a different word for burger flipping: they called it opportunity.

Rule 6: If you mess up, it's not your parents' fault, so don't whine about your mistakes; learn from them.

Rule 7: Before you were born, your parents weren't as boring as they are now. They got that way from paying your bills, cleaning your clothes and listening to you talk about how cool you thought you were. So before you save the rain forest from the parasites of your parent's generation, try delousing the closet in your own room.

Rule 8: Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life HAS NOT. In some schools, they have abolished failing grades and they'll give you as MANY TIMES as you want to get the right answer. This doesn't bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in real life.

Rule 9: Life is not divided into semesters. You don't get summers off and very few employers are interested in helping you FIND YOURSELF. Do that on your own time.

Rule 10: Television is NOT real life. In real life people actually have to leave the coffee shop and go to jobs.

Rule 11: Be nice to nerds. Chances are you'll end up working for one.

If you agree, pass it on.
If you can read this - Thank a teacher!
If you are reading it in English - Thank a soldier!!

President Barack Obama urges tighter federal gun laws

Um, Isn't already illegal to kill someone?

So does this mean he wants to take guns away from the feds? or does it mean he is finally going to stop allowing guns to be imported to help save American jobs?  yep, you guessed it. He is supporting killing more American jobs as usual and leave guns in the hands of government employees.....

Gun Control Laws

Seriously, Its already illegal to kill someone. So if your worried about that, all we need is stiffer punishment as a deterrent. Guns don't kill people, Criminals do.  So why would the Government be so pushy when it comes to gun control? Simple, the only thing that stands between them and complete control of US is our ability to rise up once more. Take all the guns away from law abiding citizens and the only ones left with guns are the criminals. When if comes to having the freedom to own a gun, or the lack of freedom of not owning one. I Choose FREEDOM!